# Community Review - Submission process (LV0 and LV1) LV0 and LV1 Community Reviewers will read a proposal and assign it a score between 1 and 5 for each of the 3 criteria (impact, feasibility, and value for money). These are three distinct scores for each of the categories. There is no additional final score as 3 criteria are looked at independently and not added together as an average. For each of the three criteria, Community Reviewers are required to give their opinion and rationale in English to explain the score and demonstrate the assessor’s critical thinking. A proposal may receive a low score for various reasons, including if the funding application form is incomplete, the applicant cannot be identified, or the project does not comply with [Fund15 rules](/current-fund/fund-basics/fund-rules.md). If a rationale does not correspond with the score given, the review will likely be filtered out in the Moderation Stage. Community Reviewers should consider and assess proposals and criteria on their own merits. Community Reviewers should only provide their own opinions. Their review should not be the work of others or an AI agent acting on their behalf. --- # Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question. Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter: ``` GET https://docs.projectcatalyst.io/current-fund/community-review/community-review-submission-process-lv0-and-lv1.md?ask= ``` The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language. The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation. Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.